Library
AIDS Education and Training Centers’ HIV Recommendations Training Initiative
- Federal guidelines and recommendations for testing and initial diagnosis
- Sample protocols, policies and procedures
- Fact sheets
- Staff training materials
- Patient education materials
- State regulations on testing and reporting
- References and resources
AIDS Education Training Centers’ National Evaluation Center [summary]
- Aim 1 (Development): Design and conduct rigorous evaluation research across AETC regions and national centers that will measure the effectiveness and impact of training and education on clinical practice; uncover barriers and challenges to applying new knowledge and skills; and have maximum impact on evaluation practice and policy across the AETC network.
- Aim 2 (Capacity Building): Stimulate innovative evaluation projects and ensure scientific excellence by developing, designing and implementing outcome evaluation projects collaboratively in each region across the AETC network, as well as the organizational capacity to ensure integrity and quality of evaluation research.
- Aim 3 (Replication): Enhance evaluation across the network by adapting proven methods for measuring AETC clinical training outcomes and applying them across local performance sites, regions and national centers.
- Aim 4 (Support): Provide methodological (both quantitative and qualitative) evaluation research design consultation and technical support to AETC regional and national centers as they implement innovative tools and best practices for measuring training outcomes.
- Aim 5 (Dissemination): Disseminate findings from evaluation projects so that they have optimum impact on further HIV clinical education and training programs.
Capacity Building Assistance Project [summary]
UCSF has a long and successful history of delivering Capacity Building Assistance (CBA) to Community-based Organizations (CBO), going back to the beginning of the epidemic. We provide information dissemination services, training, and technical assistance (TA), including the facilitation of peer-to-peer learning. Our CBA providers are also experienced at helping CBOs use social media in their prevention efforts. The purpose of our CBA project is to increase the capacity of the HIV prevention workforce at CBOs to optimize the planning, implementation, and maintenance of interventions and strategies for HIP. By doing so, UCSF will further the HIV prevention goals and objectives outlined in the National HIV/AIDS Strategy. Our Capacity Building Assistance (CBA) team includes expert CBA providers from UCSF’s Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), Center of Excellence for Transgender Health (CoE), and Alliance Health Project (AHP—formerly AIDS Health Project). Additionally, we collaborate with the Bridging Group. We have the experience and expertise to provide HIP-related CBA services to CBOs to improve their capacity to conduct HIV testing, prevention with HIV-positive individuals, and prevention with high-risk HIV-negative individuals, especially:
- Gay/bisexual/and other men who have sex with men
- Transgender women
- Communities of color
- Incarcerated populations
- Injection drug users
While we can assist CBOs implementing and adapting a broad variety of evidence-based HIV prevention approaches, our team has specialized expertise on the following interventions and public health strategies:
- The Mpowerment Project (MP)
- Personalized Cognitive Counseling (PCC)
- Couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC)
- Healthy Relationships (HR)
- Social Network Strategy for Counseling, Testing, and Referral (SNS)
- Project START
- The Bridging Group
Center of Excellence for Transgender HIV Prevention
Evaluation and Technical Assistance Center (ETAC) for the SPNS Culturally Appropriate Interventions of Outreach, Access and Retention among Latino/a Populations Initiative
- provide technical assistance (TA) to the demonstration sites regarding the development of innovative models for providing HIV and support services, as well as TA regarding methodological (both quantitative and qualitative) research design;
- conduct a rigorous multi-site evaluation of the implementation and outcomes of all interventions and the multi-site cohort as a whole; and
- lead and coordinate the efforts for publication and dissemination of findings and lessons learned from the Initiative.